|
On 17 July 2003 the MP Michael Trend (Windsor) debated the issue of Tibet in Parliament. He highlighted the plight of released Tibetan prisoner Ngawang Sangdrol, and argued that against the background of the international war against terrorism, we have a moral duty to support Tibet:
"Tibet has been occupied for 53 years now. The Government are very knowledgeable on United Nations resolutions, a number of which cover Tibet. They deal with the human rights' abuses; the transfer of the population on a massive scale; the destruction of whole communities, monasteries and cultural buildings; the degradation of the environment; and the assault on the freedoms of the nomadic way of life. International pressure can, and has, made a difference.
The All-Party Group on Tibet was fortunate to be visited recently by Ngawang Sangdrol, a 23 year old young woman from Tibet whose story illustrates what peaceful protest means there. For demonstrating with a small group of young nuns when she was 13, and for calling for Tibetan independence, she was imprisoned for two years. Because she would not recant and sang songs honouring the Dalai Lama, she was subjected to brutal imprisonments and stripped of her civil rights. |
She has been released after 11 years, only through the efforts of Amnesty International and many others… [She] is one of hundreds of political detainees - of young people born under the Chinese occupation of Tibet who have steadfastly followed the Dalai Lama's non-violent approach. It would surely be far easier for many of them to follow the more familiar path of the dispossessed and aggrieved of today's world - to meet violence and violence - but they do not. The difference for the Tibetans is the Dalai Lama: a man of enormous authority to his people and of absolute peace to the world. He is a firm believer in non-violence, and states:
'We are freedom fighters unique in our peaceful approach to liberation… Should this experiment prove successful, it could have a revolutionary effect on future struggles for freedom'.
Our country is acutely aware of the threat of terrorism, both internally and internationally. I have supported the Government in their actions in recent months, and I believe that we are right to protest our own interests against organised terrorism. But I also recognise… much in the world situation is feeding the recruitment of terrorists. |
This, uniquely, is not the situation with the people of Tibet. Where others speak the language of war and practise it, the Dalai Lama speaks only the language of peace and seeks a non-violent resolution of his people's desperate plight. Is that not what we ask all world leaders to do, and should we not seek to help those few - those very few - who actually do it?
UK Governments past and present have shown the value of innovative non-violent approaches in Northern Ireland. The UK speaks with first-hand experience of terrorism and the path to resolution. [The Tibetans'] grievances should be heard, and resolutions should be found to their legitimate concerns; otherwise, we leave them no alternative but violence and terrorism.
However much praise has been given to the Dalai Lama and to the Tibetan people, in practical terms it has been almost meaningless. Tibetans could easily point to numerous examples of violence achieving the desired results.
Against the background of the international war against terrorism, there should be a global message that non-violent protest against gross violations of basic human rights deserves our support and should be helped to succeed." |